IS-BAO Newsletter | August 2014
|IS-BAH Has Arrived
Implemented on July 1, 2014, following 2 years of development, the International Standard for Business Aircraft Handling (IS-BAH) provides FBO’s and Aircraft Handling Agencies with a set of industry best practices (benchmarks) that incorporates a registration process which includes a validation of a business aircraft handling organization’s Safety Management System (SMS). IS-BAH is the outcome of a blending of the NATA’s Safety First Ground Handling Standard and the structure and content of the International Standard for Business Aircraft Operations (IS-BAO). This joint venture by the International Business Aviation Council (IBAC) and the National Air Transportation Association has resulted in a program that is offered by IBAC through its member associations. Information concerning how to purchase the IS-BAH manual, register for a “Fundamentals of IS-BAH” workshop, or apply to become an IS-BAH accredited auditor can be found by visiting www.ibac.org and selecting IS-BAH.The inaugural set of workshops, fundamentals and auditor, with be held in Paris, France on August 27 and 28. Within North America the first workshops will be conducted in Atlanta, Georgia on September 17 and 18 at the Flight Safety Inc. training center, located at ATL.
|The Accountable Executive – Who should it be?
Someone has to be in charge of every function within a company. Without a responsible, accountable person associated with all functions the organization will falter. But, what about the entire organization? Chief executive officers, presidents and managing partners are the titles normally assigned to those with the ultimate responsibility for the overall success of the organization. There are likely subordinates – executive vice presidents, managing directors, division managers – who are responsible for designated sections/functions of the organization, but only one person is normally in overall charge of the entire organization.
IS-BAO 3.2.1b states, “The organization shall identify the accountable executive who, irrespective of other functions, has ultimate responsibility and accountability, on behalf of the organization, for the implementation and maintenance of the SMS.” Sounds like this person should be the CEO or an equivalent, doesn’t it? Unfortunately, we find that a variety of subordinates are assigned this responsibility within a number of IS-BAO companies; flight department managers, vice presidents of real estate, transportation directors and environmental, health and safety directors are often named as supposedly having the ultimate responsibility and accountability for the aviation organization.
The CEO, or equivalent person, should be designated because only he/she can make the ultimate decision to ensure safe operations of any function within the company. While much of this may be delegated to subordinates, the buck stops at the top; this includes the safety buck. So, educate the ultimate boss regarding the aviation safety and risk management functions within the company, first presenting the company flight department safety policy for signature and then keeping him or her informed regard the progress of the aviation safety management system. That way there will be no surprises.
|Fundamentals of IS-BAO Workshop
Have you ever attended the IS-BAO Fundamentals Workshop? Even if your organization is IS-BAO registered you may not fully appreciate how all of the pieces of the program fit together to support the SMS. Every registrant’s key personnel, managerial and supervisory, should have the big picture for IS-BAO. And, how about a refresher for key people in the department or the accountable executive in the parent company?
The Fundamentals Workshop provides a great overview of the entire program with emphasis on SMS and how it is fed by all parts of the organization. This information-packed workshop will make you and your people better appreciate the IS-BAO program and serve to motivate them to better employ its features. See IS-BAO Workshop Information.
|US Minimum Equipment Lists
We specify an MEL for IS-BAO where a Master MEL (MMEL) is available because ICAO does so in their standards. Since the FAA will not approve a Part 91 MEL, only issuing a Letter of Authorization (LOA) for a MMEL to be used as an MEL. The MMEL LOA is acceptable for use within the US, unfortunately, many operators miss the point that they must also devise detailed maintenance and operations procedures to be used the MMEL. While IS-BAO will accept a LOA for N-registered aircraft when detailed M&O procedures have been added, overseas regulators may not, although anecdotally the LOA has been accepted as an authorizing document during foreign ramp checks.
We occasionally receive comments from auditors and registrants regarding standards creep, the tendency for the number IS-BAO standards to increase over time, with few being removed. Since many of our standards are derived from ICAO standards and recommended practices to ensure that IS-BAO registered are acceptable to a maximum number of States, it is understandable that the standard will grow over time, yet only as allowed by the industry via the IS-BAO Standards Board.
Best practices derived from industry-recognized organizations, IBAC affiliates and State requirements are carefully vetted by the IS-BAO staff and the IS-BAO Standards Board to ensure relevancy and criticality. Most of these practices are introduced as recommended practices and only after a year or two of use by registrants they may be adopted as standards.
We attempt to keep the creep to a minimum but are driven by outside forces to consider a variety of international, state and industry for inclusion in the standard. Normally, less than half of the inputs for change are adopted after the staff and the Standards Board evaluates the proposals.
|Extensions to Registration Expiration Dates
If the IS-BAO system is working correctly, little or no preparation is needed for subsequent audits. That is, the upcoming audit looks at events occurring since the last audit, not at a future period. Yet, a surprising number of operators request extensions of their registration period of up to six months, stating that they “must get ready for the audit.” This type of request is routinely denied.
Legitimate requests for extensions due to conflicts arising from major changes within the department, heavy vacation or training schedules, loss of personnel or seasonal increased flight demands are considered on their merits, usually resulting in an extension of not more than 30 to 45 days. Check with email@example.com.
|Bits and Pieces
Enjoy the continuing benefits of IS-BAO.
Have you reviewed your flight department
safety risk profile within the past six months?
International Business Aviation Council Ltd (IBAC)